[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12874083#action_12874083
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-4653:
---------------------------------------
I think that sounds like a good idea to check the file for the RDBCMM string
and to make the name more predictable, you might want to use traceFile instead
of traceDirectory. Also I think it makes sense to check in the commit part of
this patch while working through the rollback issues in another patch, but it
would be good to do so with the regression test for the commit portion.
> Avoid unnecessary round-trip for commit/rollback in the client driver
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4653
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4653
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: JDBC, Network Client
> Affects Versions: 10.7.0.0
> Reporter: Kristian Waagan
> Assignee: Lily Wei
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: _sds_0, DERBY-4653-1.diff, DERBY-4653-2.diff,
> SaveRoundClientDS.java
>
>
> The methods Connection.commit() and Connection.rollback() in the client
> driver cause a round-trip to the server even if the commit/rollback is
> unnecessary (i.e. there is nothing to commit or roll back).
> Comments suggest (see below) that this can be optimized, such that the
> commands are flowed to the server only when required. It can be seen that
> this optimization has been used other places in the client driver. Never the
> less, it must be checked that this optimization doesn't have side-effects.
> This issue came up in connection with connection pooling, where a pool
> implementation always issued a rollback to make sure there was no active
> transaction on the connection handed out.
> From Connection.flowCommit:
> // Per JDBC specification (see javadoc for Connection.commit()):
> // "This method should be used only when auto-commit mode has been
> disabled."
> // However, some applications do this anyway, it is harmless, so
> // if they ask to commit, we could go ahead and flow a commit.
> // But note that rollback() is less harmless, rollback() shouldn't be
> used in auto-commit mode.
> // This behavior is subject to further review.
> // if (!this.inUnitOfWork)
> // return;
> // We won't try to be "too smart", if the user requests a commit,
> we'll flow a commit,
> // regardless of whether or not we're in a unit of work or in
> auto-commit mode.
> //
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
