On 07/13/10 10:33 PM, Tiago Espinha wrote: > I think ideally we'd keep the max number of ports on a tight fit to what is > actually needed, that's why I left them at 10. This way if new ports are > required along the way, whoever makes the changes gets alerted that they need > to > increase this constant. >
What does the limit of 10 ports mean, exactly? Does it mean that there could be a maximum of 10 ports in use at the same time? Or does it mean that a maximum of 10 tests can use an alternative port? Thanks, -- Knut Anders
