[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12897269#action_12897269
]
Yun Lee commented on DERBY-3801:
--------------------------------
I have created DERBY-4767 for Error message XCL16.
As you said
"2. difference in text for Error message XCL16 between client and embedded.
This should get corrected by making the messages identical.
I did not find an existing bug on this issue.
You should log a new bug (improvement) for this difference (and link it to
DERBY-301).
I took a superficial look, and it seems to me that it might be possible to
figure out the operations in which CLIENT_RESULT_SET_NOT_OPEN (XCL16.S.1 in
loc.messages.xml and shared.common.reference.SQLState.java) is generated, and
pass them on.
A separate test case (test cases) should be added in some junit test
somewhere. "
I have a question about this. Need I change Derby client code to match behavior
with Embedded driver? Does it mean that in this issue,
CLIENT_RESULT_SET_NOT_OPEN(XCL16.S.1) should be replaced by
LANG_RESULT_SET_NOT_OPEN(XCL16.S.0)? And then, why did DERBY created two
different(but very similiar) messages?
> Convert "org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.lang.holdCursorIJ.sql"
> to junit.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3801
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3801
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Test
> Reporter: Junjie Peng
> Assignee: Yun Lee
> Attachments: derby-3801-1-patch.txt, derby-3801-2.patch,
> derby-3801-2.stat, derby-3801-4.patch, derby-3801-5.patch, derby-3801-5.stat,
> derby-3801-6.patch, derby-3801-6.stat, DERBY-3801-Tiago.patch
>
>
> Convert "org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.lang.holdCursorIJ.sql"
> to junit.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
