Perhaps it would make sense to use the maximum VARCHAR length (32672)?
+1
I prefer the longer-columns solution to the truncate-the-values solution.
thanks,
bryan
P.S. Thanks Stephan for investigating these problems! I'm looking
forward to your proposed fixes.
Hi everyone,
While running my personal tests (so far).. it seems like changing the
mentioned columns to VARCHAR(32672) addresses the problems.
I'll run a few final tests tomorrow. If these work out as well, I'll
propose a few simple simple patches and hopefully come up with some
unit-tests... if I don't have to disclose a lot.
I'd really like to have the fixes in Derby 10.6.1.2, so I'll try hard to
beat time.
Regards,
Stephan.
