[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kristian Waagan closed DERBY-3898.
----------------------------------
As an invalid length must be specified to trigger this difference between the
drivers, backporting it is not justified for me.
If anyone else want to do so, feel free to reopen the issue and do the work.
Closing issue.
> Blob.setBytes differs between embedded and client driver when the specified
> length is invalid
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-3898
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3898
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC
> Affects Versions: 10.3.3.0, 10.4.2.0, 10.5.1.1, 10.6.1.0
> Reporter: Kristian Waagan
> Assignee: Yun Lee
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.7.1.0
>
> Attachments: derby-3898-1.patch, derby-3898-1.stat,
> derby-3898-testcase.patch, derby-3898-testcase.stat, Derby3898.java,
> enable-javame.diff, overflow.diff
>
>
> Blob.setBytes behaves differently with the embedded driver and the client
> driver.
> Assume a 1 byte array and a specified length of 2: Blob.setBytes(1, new
> byte[] {0x69}, 0, 2)
> Embedded: IndexOutOfBoundsException (from java.io.RandomAccessFile.writeBytes
> or System.arraycopy)
> Client: succeeds, returns insertion count 1
> The behavior should be made consistent, but what is the correct behavior?
> From the Blob.setBytes JavaDoc:
> "Writes all or part of the given byte array to the BLOB value that this Blob
> object represents and returns the number of bytes written. Writing starts at
> position pos in the BLOB value; len bytes from the given byte array are
> written. The array of bytes will overwrite the existing bytes in the Blob
> object starting at the position pos. If the end of the Blob value is reached
> while writing the array of bytes, then the length of the Blob value will be
> increased to accomodate the extra bytes."
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
