[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983738#action_12983738
]
Dag H. Wanvik commented on DERBY-4967:
--------------------------------------
Thanks, Knut. Just checked, RAF.close() doesn't give an interrupt as far as I
can see, but it seems safer, I agree, I'll fix that plus the nit, +1 to
simplification :)
> Handle interrupt received while waiting for database lock
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4967
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4967
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Store
> Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
> Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
> Fix For: 10.8.0.0
>
> Attachments: derby-4967-locking-1.diff, derby-4967-locking-1.stat,
> derby-4967-locking-2.diff, derby-4967-locking-2.stat,
> derby-4967-locking-3.diff, derby-4967-locking-3.stat
>
>
> Subtask of DERBY-4741: this issue tracks the changes needed to handle
> interrupt received while a thread is waiting for a database lock.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
