[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-4373:
---------------------------------

    Labels: derby_triage10_8  (was: )

> different results with network server vs. embedded on select from a temporary 
> table with resultset cursor hold over commit
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4373
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4373
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.6.1.0
>            Reporter: Myrna van Lunteren
>              Labels: derby_triage10_8
>         Attachments: repro_d4373.java
>
>
> Found this during review of conversion of declareGlobalTempTableJavaJDBC30 to 
> junit (DERBY-2895) - when I tried to run the test with network server:
> We define a statement like so:
>         Statement s1 = conn.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY, 
> ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY,
>                     ResultSet.HOLD_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT );
> and global temp table like so:
>             s1.executeUpdate("declare global temporary table SESSION.t1(c11 
> int, c12 int) on commit delete rows not logged");
> Then, we insert 2 rows, open a result set that selects *, then do commit.
> With a new resultset, we do another select, which with network server gives 0 
> rows, but with embedded, 2.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to