On 2/15/11 10:30 AM, Kathey Marsden wrote:
On 2/15/2011 10:12 AM, Mike Matrigali wrote:
10.8 triage - we should be updating both urgency and adding label right?
I think the queries are dropping the issue off the list if you just
add the label.
I could change the untriaged ones to have something like:
project=DERBY AND Type = "Bug" AND Resolution = Unresolved and
COMPONENT = JDBC AND fixVersion IS EMPTY AND Urgency IS EMPTY
But it won't catch it if you forget the label.
One possibility might be to bulk update the ones that have Urgency but
no label to have a derby_triage_10_5_2 and then maybe I can write a
query that will check for both urgency and the 10.8 label. I will see
if I can do that.
Meanwhile, yes, please mark both urgency and add the label.
Thanks
Kathey
Ah dear, well I forgot to adjust the Urgency field. It is not a driving
concern for me as the 10.8 release manager. I am chiefly concerned about
the bugs on these lists:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenEightOneRelease#A10.8.1_Bug_Fixes So
far I don't see anything on those lists which qualifies as a Blocker.
Thanks,
-Rick
