Myrna van Lunteren <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen > <[email protected]> wrote: >> [email protected] (Dag H. Wanvik) writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Mike Matrigali <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> When I went to look at tests on the following site I got a lot of bad >>>> url messages. I am not sure I have looked at these links before so not >>>> sure if this is a new error or not. >>>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/ >>> >>> Is see the tinderbox tests seem to be OK for trunk and the 10.7 branch: >>> >>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_trunk16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/index.html >>> http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_10.7_16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/index.html >>> >>> Maybe it's not set up yet for 10.8.. Knut will know. >> >> That's right, the nightly tests and the tinderbox haven't been set up to >> run on the 10.8 branch yet. >> >> -- >> Knut Anders >> > > Not to put any pressure on - are there plans to do so?
I tried to get the 10.8 tinderbox running a while ago, but got lost in a forest of scripts and cronjobs, and eventually gave up. I gave it another try now, and I seem to have been more successful this time: http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/tinderbox_10.8_16/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/ > In the same line, I noticed that the 1.7 test results for trunk have > stopped running, last good run was 5/23: > http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.7/testing/Limited/index_all.html > Any ideas why? The JDK 7 installation in the test lab was upgraded and a regression in java.sql.BatchUpdateException killed most of the tests (http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7049107). The machines were upgraded to JDK 7 b145 earlier today, and that's supposed to fix it. > By the way, the IBM regression tests for 10.8 once again are suffering > from strange issues with the reports, e.g.: > http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_8/windows/testSummary-1133230.html. > I'll be looking into it. Something similar happened a while ago, I > don't know why. Looks like the suites.All output for the Windows test is truncated, which is probably what confuses the reporting scripts: http://people.apache.org/~myrnavl/derby_test_results/v10_8/windows/testlog/ibm16/1133230-suites.All_diff.txt Maybe one of the tests got stuck? -- Knut Anders
