Kathey Marsden <[email protected]> writes: > Myrna noticed that the IBM largeData test results were truncated, > probably because they did not finish and were interrupted by the next > day's run. I don't have test history, so am not sure if these tests > have become slower or just actually never finished. > > I noticed the last posted results for the Sun JVM were for revision > 835496 which was in the 10.6 timeframe. > http://dbtg.foundry.sun.com/derby/test/trunk15/largedata/testing/Limited/testSummary-current.html > > At that time, the duration was 242.62% of revision 433306 which was in > the 10.3 timeframe. > > I was wondering > 1) Does anyone remember if we understood the duration difference with > revision 835496? > 2) Is there a more comprehensive history available? > 3) Are there more recent statistics?
I cannot find any newer results than revision 835496. Looking at whatever is left of logs from these runs I see this: ,---- | Built on SunOS 5.10 i386 i86pc[siv02.norway.sun.com] at 2006-08-21 19:47:02 | | Suite Tests Passed Failed Skippd Duration | largeData 4 4 0 0 04:27:07 | | Started: 2006-08-21 23:30:04 End: 2006-08-22 03:57:15 Host: siv39.norway.sun.com `---- and ,---- | Built on SunOS 5.10 i386 i86pc[siv02.norway.sun.com] at 2009-11-12 19:47:04 | | Suite Tests Passed Failed Skippd Duration | largeData 1 1 0 0 10:48:06 | | Started: 2009-11-13 02:00:04 End: 2009-11-13 12:48:17 Host: nanna18.norway.sun.com `---- So it looks like the 433306 run was on a different machine than the 835496 run, which might explain the difference in duration. I have never run this test suite myself, so I don't know what it means that one of them reports four tests passed and the other one just one test. -- Knut Anders
