"Bergquist, Brett" <bbergqu...@canoga.com> writes: > I found some information. I found that if I include my JAR file > containing my Restricted Table code in the classpath before starting > the network server, then the code can load correctly and it has access > to the "org.apache.derby.vti.RestrictedVTI" class and others. If > however the code is loaded through the SQLJ.INSTALL_JAR procedure, > then the code does not have access to the > "org.apache.derby.vti.RestrticedVTI" class or others. > > Is this expected? I really would like to be able to install my table > function code to be in the database and not have to manipulate the > classpath. No where in the documentation does it say that this cannot > be done, but it does not work. > > Should I write up an issue in JIRA?
I think this is intended to work, so a JIRA issue would be in order. This bug looks somewhat related: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4126 In that bug, we had to make the VTICosting interface available for the procedures. I guess we'll need a similar trick for RestrictedVTI. -- Knut Anders
