Kathey Marsden <[email protected]> writes: > On 9/9/2011 7:52 AM, Myrna van Lunteren wrote: >> I don't see a problem with increasing the 3rd digit... If it gets in >> the way (although I can't see why it would), I can always up the >> fourth digit and declare 10.8.2.1 the first 10.8.2 candidate instead >> of 10.8.2.0. Myrna > I think it would be good for clarity to bump the fourth digit if there > are fixes that go in after Knut's but before the RC.
It turned out the fix could be backported without changing any of the digits in the version number. I've now backported it, and the version on the branch is still 10.8.1.6. Thanks, -- Knut Anders
