Client differs from embedded when rs.updateInt overflows: 22015 vs 22003
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: DERBY-5533
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5533
Project: Derby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: JDBC, Network Client
Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
Priority: Minor
stm.executeUpdate("create table t(i smallint)");
stm.executeUpdate("insert into t values 1,2,3,4");
ResultSet rs = stm.executeQuery("select i from t");
rs.next();
try {
rs.updateInt(1, 100000);
} catch (SQLException e) {
// client: 22015 vs embedded 22003
}
According to the standard, 22015 should be used for INTERVALs ("interval field
overflow"). 22003 seems more correct, the standard uses that for "numeric value
out of range".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
