[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13175151#comment-13175151
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-5552:
---------------------------------------
Hi Brett,
I am glad you are making progress as I was clearly misunderstanding your
scenario.
Although the residual xa transactions are there in the database, I looked at
the client traces and don't see any indication that XA transactions are being
used in the test in fact even the names of the the trace files _driver_?
indicate a driver manager connection and not an xa datasource connection which
would have been created in files _xads_?. Since there were no XA transactions,
there was not the SYNCCTL with possible missing SYNCCRD exchanges that I was
looking for.
Your logic on the above change sounds reasonable to me, but I don't think I am
the best person to review that change. After you run tests, post a patch and
mark patch available and I am sure the community will review and expedite
commit of the change if it is the right thing. I think it would definitely be
good to get a test checked in too so we don't regress.
> Derby threads hanging when using ClientXADataSource and a deadlock or lock
> timeout occurs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5552
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.8.1.2
> Environment: Solaris 10, Glassfish V2.1.1,
> Reporter: Brett Bergquist
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: appserverstack.txt, client.tar.Z, derby.log,
> derbystackatshutdown.txt, execute.patch, transactionsleft.txt
>
>
> The issue arrives when multiple XA transactions are done in parallel and
> there is either a lock timeout or a lock deadlock detected. When this
> happens the connection is leaked in the Glassfish connection pool and the
> client thread hangs in
> "org.apache.derby.client.netReply.fill(Reply.java:172)".
> Shutting down the app server fails because the thread has a lock in
> "org.apache.derby.client.net.NetConnection40" and another task is calling
> "org.apache.derby.client.ClientPooledConnection.close(ClientPooledConnection.java:214)"
> which is waiting for the lock.
> Killing the appsever using "kill" and then attempting to shutdown Derby
> network server causes the Network Server to hang. One of the threads hangs
> waiting for a lock at
> "org.apache.derby.impl.drda.NeworkServerControlImpl.removeFromSessionTable(NetworkServerControlImpl.java:1525)"
> and the "main" thread has this locked at
> "org.apache.derby.impl.drda.NetworkServerControlImpl.executeWork(NetworkServerControlImpl.java:2242)"
> and it itself is waiting for a lock which belongs to a thread that is stuck
> at
> "org.apache.derby.impl.services.locks.ActiveLock.waitForGrant(ActiveLock.java:118)
> which is in the TIMED_WAITING state.
> Only by killing the Network Server using "kill" is possible at this point.
> There are transactions left even though all clients have been removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
