[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-866:
--------------------------------

    Attachment: derby-866-08-ad-passwordHasher.diff

Attaching derby-866-08-ad-passwordHasher.diff. This rev of the patch stops 
users from manipulating NATIVE passwords when 
derby.authentication.builtin.algorithm is not set. If 
derby.authentication.builtin.algorithm is not set, then Derby's old-style 
default password hashing strategy is considered too weak for use by NATIVE 
authentication. Tests passed cleanly for me with this version of the patch.

I do not see much point in further complicating the logic to allow the use of 
weak hashing with NATIVE authentication. Of course, we could change the meaning 
of derby.authentication.builtin.algorithm=null when NATIVE authentication is 
enabled. However, that seems more confusing to me than just forbidding the use 
of weak hashing altogether.

The functional spec should be updated to reflect this change.

This version of the patch touches the same files as the previous version plus 
the following:

-----------------

M       java/engine/org/apache/derby/loc/messages.xml
M       java/shared/org/apache/derby/shared/common/reference/SQLState.java

New message raised if the user attempts to manipulate a NATIVE password when 
derby.authentication.builtin.algorithm is not set.

-----------------

M       
java/testing/org/apache/derbyTesting/functionTests/tests/upgradeTests/Changes10_9.java

The 10.9 upgrade tests now set derby.authentication.builtin.algorithm if it is 
not set already. This allows us to test the new NATIVE procedures in databases 
which were hard-upgraded from Derby versions which did not recognize this 
property.

                
> Derby User Management Enhancements
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-866
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-866
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Services
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.1.6
>            Reporter: Francois Orsini
>            Assignee: Rick Hillegas
>         Attachments: Derby_User_Enhancement.html, 
> Derby_User_Enhancement_v1.1.html, DummyAuthenticator.java, 
> UserManagement.html, UserManagement.html, UserManagement.html, 
> UserManagement.html, derby-866-01-aa-sysusers.diff, 
> derby-866-01-ab-sysusers.diff, derby-866-02-ag-createDropUser.diff, 
> derby-866-03-aa-resetModifyPassword.diff, 
> derby-866-03-ab-resetModifyPassword.diff, derby-866-04-aa-fixRolesTest.diff, 
> derby-866-05-aa-grantRevoke.diff, derby-866-06-aa-upgradeFrom10.1.diff, 
> derby-866-07-aa-removeSQLPassword.diff, derby-866-08-aa-passwordHasher.diff, 
> derby-866-08-ab-passwordHasher.diff, derby-866-08-ad-passwordHasher.diff, 
> dummyCredentials.properties
>
>
> Proposal to enhance Derby's Built-In DDL User Management. (See proposal spec 
> attached to the JIRA).
> Abstract:
> This feature aims at improving the way BUILT-IN users are managed in Derby by 
> providing a more intuitive and familiar DDL interface. Currently (in 
> 10.1.2.1), Built-In users can be defined at the system and/or database level. 
> Users created at the system level can be defined via JVM or/and Derby system 
> properties in the derby.properties file. Built-in users created at the 
> database level are defined via a call to a Derby system procedure 
> (SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_SET_DATABASE_PROPERTY) which sets a database property.
> Defining a user at the system level is very convenient and practical during 
> the development phase (EOD) of an application - However, the user's password 
> is not encrypted and consequently appears in clear in the derby.properties 
> file. Hence, for an application going into production, whether it is embedded 
> or not, it is preferable to create users at the database level where the 
> password is encrypted.
> There is no real ANSI SQL standard for managing users in SQL but by providing 
> a more intuitive and known interface, it will ease Built-In User management 
> at the database level as well as Derby's adoption.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to