[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13179221#comment-13179221
 ] 

Brett Bergquist commented on DERBY-5552:
----------------------------------------

I guess where I am coming from is that the cleanup for a lock timeout or 
deadlock is NOT closing the connection nor should it be.  The connection IS 
going to be used again right after the cleanup returns the error to retrieve 
the exception message text.  So nulling out the connection is wrong the way it 
is.  The other places where the connection is nulled out are when the XA end is 
being processed.  Now the application level connection is no longer being used 
because XA has been signaled that there is no more interaction using the 
connection, so to me this make sense.

One thing to remember is that the change is only affecting the XA transactions, 
not the general usagen.

As for the other calls not being synchronized, maybe they should be but I don't 
know.  
                
> Derby threads hanging when using ClientXADataSource and a deadlock or lock 
> timeout occurs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5552
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5552
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Server
>    Affects Versions: 10.8.1.2
>         Environment: Solaris 10, Glassfish V2.1.1,
>            Reporter: Brett Bergquist
>            Priority: Blocker
>         Attachments: DERBY-5552-p1.patch, DERBY-5552-p2.patch, 
> appserverstack.txt, client.tar.Z, derby.log, derbystackatshutdown.txt, 
> execute.patch, transactionsleft.txt
>
>
> The issue arrives when multiple XA transactions are done in parallel and 
> there is either a lock timeout or a lock deadlock detected.  When this 
> happens the connection is leaked in the Glassfish connection pool and the 
> client thread hangs in 
> "org.apache.derby.client.netReply.fill(Reply.java:172)".  
> Shutting down the app server fails because the thread has a lock in 
> "org.apache.derby.client.net.NetConnection40" and another task is calling 
> "org.apache.derby.client.ClientPooledConnection.close(ClientPooledConnection.java:214)"
>  which is waiting for the lock.
> Killing the appsever using "kill" and then attempting to shutdown Derby 
> network server causes the Network Server to hang.  One of the threads hangs 
> waiting for a lock at 
> "org.apache.derby.impl.drda.NeworkServerControlImpl.removeFromSessionTable(NetworkServerControlImpl.java:1525)"
>  and the "main" thread has this locked at 
> "org.apache.derby.impl.drda.NetworkServerControlImpl.executeWork(NetworkServerControlImpl.java:2242)"
>  and it itself is waiting for a lock which belongs to a thread that is stuck 
> at 
> "org.apache.derby.impl.services.locks.ActiveLock.waitForGrant(ActiveLock.java:118)
>  which is in the TIMED_WAITING state.
> Only by killing the Network Server using "kill" is possible at this point.
> There are transactions left even though all clients have been removed.  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to