[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13220907#comment-13220907
 ] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-5328:
--------------------------------------

Hi Kristian,

That sounds reasonable to me. I agree that this servlet doesn't serve up high 
volumes of content. I can't imagine why multiple users would want to bounce the 
server and toggle tracing off and on as fast as they could. This is an 
administrative tool so making doGet() synchronized would be fine. Thanks.
                
> The private fields of the NetServlet can be changed by multiple threads, 
> giving rise to race conditions and corruptions.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5328
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5328
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Network Server
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>              Labels: derby_triage10_9
>         Attachments: derby-5328-01-aa-simpleFields.diff
>
>
> At the beginning of the NetServlet class, there are a number of private 
> fields. These fields can be inspected and changed by any thread running 
> inside NetServlet.doGet(). Due to the way that app servers dispatch servlet 
> requests, this means that multiple threads can be operating inside doGet() at 
> the same time, clobbering one another's work. The weirdest instance of this 
> is the shared PrintWriter (called "out") which is used to produce the 
> response web page sent back by the servlet. Multiple threads all writing to 
> the same PrintWriter will create a very bizarre response page. The following 
> improvements should be made:
> 1) The "server" field should be set by a synchronized method.
> 2) Every run through doGet() should create its own PrintWriter which is 
> passed to other methods. The instance-wide "out" field should be removed.
> 3) Various other fields should be re-coded using the Atomic classes 
> introduced by Java 5. These fields include "logStatus" and "traceStatus". 
> This solution can be implemented if the community votes to approve the 
> sunsetting of JVM 1.4 (currently at the polls).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to