On 4/11/2012 9:16 AM, Rick Hillegas wrote:
I am volunteering to manage a 10.9.1 feature release. Please let me know if you are comfortable with the plan posted here: http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/DerbyTenNineOneRelease The plan calls for a first release candidate on May 21 and GA on June 20.
Since the number of upgrade/downgrade trajectories and mixed client server versions increases dramatically with each new version, along with more builds and tests with multiple jdk versions and platforms to track. I would think maybe a bug fix drive followed by a 10.8.3 release and then a 10.9 late in the year with more than the short list of features we have on the 10.9 list would be good.

Are there pressing needs that necessitate a 10.9 vs a 10.8.3 right away? I believe release early, release often is good, but because of the explosive nature of maintenance with each new major release, I think it might be good to do one more 10.8 release before 10.9.

Just my opinion.

Kathey


Reply via email to