Hmm, if there's code covered by insane builds which is not covered by sane builds, is that really a problem? We would just have to make sure that regressions are ran against insane jars and all would be well. Or am I missing something?
I think one issue is that we may find that a substantial amount of the "missing" code coverage is due to extra sanity checking code that is only exercised in the sane builds. So in fact that code *is* covered by our test suite; we just couldn't tell because we weren't running Emma in the sane configuration. thanks, bryan
