[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13270557#comment-13270557
 ] 

Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-5747:
--------------------------------------

Thanks, Dag. Can you list other uses of SYSUSERS which you think we may want to 
explore in the future (probably not in 10.9)? This may help us understand 
whether there are some cheap changes which we can make in 10.9 in order to 
support those later extensions. Thanks.
                
> Native user authentication: Docs do not describe what happens to schema and 
> its SQL objects on SYSCS_UTIL.SYSCS_DROP_USER call
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-5747
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5747
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Documentation, Services
>    Affects Versions: 10.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Assignee: Kim Haase
>         Attachments: repro2.sh
>
>
> Currently, the schema and the objects remain after the user is dropped, cf. 
> repro2.sh attached.
> The authorization id of the schema of the dropped user is still that id 
> (dangling) after DROP.
> Perhaps ownership should revert to the DBO when a user is dropped, or should 
> DROP USER do a cascade delete?
> There is no way currently to change the ownership of the schema to another 
> user.
> At the very least we should document what happens.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to