On 05/22/2012 07:51 AM, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
I'm wondering if it would be more reasonable just to remove the two
classes and make writeUDT() use either java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream or
EncodedInputStream.PublicBufferOutputStream instead. The latter class
already is in the client.net package, but it would probably be a good
idea to make it a stand-alone class and not an inner class if we want to
reuse it in the Request class.
That would reduce the code size and increase the percentage covered.
+1
This sounds like a great idea to me. Nufail, what do you think?
thanks,
bryan
