[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13285684#comment-13285684
]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-4269:
-------------------------------------------
It looks good to me too. Do we need similar changes for the other occurrences
of this pattern too? Maybe we could make pingConnect() as tolerant as
waitForConnect(), so that no changes are needed in the test cases themselves?
(The former only tolerate 08004 errors while waiting for the server to come up,
whereas the latter accepts all errors.)
> Failover did not succeed in 2 min.: testReplication_Local_3_p6_autocommit_OK
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-4269
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4269
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Replication
> Affects Versions: 10.6.1.0
> Environment: OS:
> Microsoft© Windows VistaT Ultimate - 6.0.6001 Service Pack 1 - WindowsNT 0 6
> JVM:
> Sun Microsystems Inc.
> java version "1.4.2_16"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_16-b05)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_16-b05 mixed mode 32-bit)
> Reporter: Ole Solberg
> Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: derby_triage10_5_2
> Attachments: DERBY-4269.diff, DERBY-4269.stat
>
>
> Failover did not succeed.
> 2)
> testReplication_Local_3_p6_autocommit_OK(org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.replicationTests.ReplicationRun_Local_3_p6)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
> Failover did not succeed.
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.replicationTests.ReplicationRun.connectPing(ReplicationRun.java:270)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.replicationTests.ReplicationRun_Local_3_p6.derby_3896(ReplicationRun_Local_3_p6.java:200)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.replicationTests.ReplicationRun_Local_3_p6.testReplication_Local_3_p6_autocommit_OK(ReplicationRun_Local_3_p6.java:86)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at
> org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.BaseTestCase.runBare(BaseTestCase.java:106)
> at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:24)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:21)
> at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25)
> See
> http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.4/testing/testlog/vista-64/782274-suitesAll_diff.txt
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
