Hi, I created a JIRA issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5851. It contains details on how to reproduce this behaviour.
Thank you. Nufail. On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Bryan Pendleton <bpendleton.de...@gmail.com>wrote: > I think when pooled connection is used it should create logical >> statements and under JDBC4 it should create xxxx40 statements. >> So all calls should go through those classes. Is there a reason for >> coverage report showing no coverage for some methods, which >> are called in the test classes and whose physical statement methods are >> also covered? >> > > Three possibilities come to mind: > > 1) The test isn't actually running under JDBC4? > > 2) The code coverage tool is providing an inaccurate report? > > 3) The decision about when to use LogicalPreparedStatement40 is > more complicated, and there is some other factor involved? > > Perhaps it would help if you posted a patch to JIRA, with instructions > about the test you're trying, and others could try to reproduce the > behavior you're seeing. > > thanks, > > bryan > -- Mohamed Nufail Undergraduate, Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Moratuwa. Blog: http://www.nufailm.blogspot.com/
