[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13416275#comment-13416275
]
Mohamed Nufail commented on DERBY-5851:
---------------------------------------
Bryan, I think the wiki pages can be updated with this info. I will look into
it.
Also, I added a connectionCPDecorator to the following tests and they also
showed an improvement in code coverage. And it might help to make sure that
different statement implementations do not behave differently.
- org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.derbynet.PrepareStatementTest
- org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbc4.CallableStatementTest
- org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbcapi.CallableTest
> Inconsistent code coverage shown for LogicalPreparedStatement40
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5851
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5851
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mohamed Nufail
> Assignee: Mohamed Nufail
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: derby-5851-CPdecorator.patch
>
>
> I tried running
> org.apache.derbyTesting.functionTests.tests.jdbc4.PreparedStatementTest with
> a connectionCPDecorator in a JDBC4 environment. So this should actually run
> the test with LogicalPreparedStatement40 statements.
> But in code coverage report methods such as setNClob show no coverage in
> LogicalPreparedStatement40 class. But in PreparedStatement40 class all these
> methods are shown as covered. Actually those method calls should go to
> PreparedStatement40 through LogicalPreparedStatement40. But it is not shown
> in emma code coverage report.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
