Kristian Waagan <[email protected]> writes: > On 10.08.2012 18:29, [email protected] wrote: >> Rick Hillegas<[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Thanks for the code snippet, Kristian. I don't see this as a Derby >>> problem. >> Hmm.. IMHO I'd like a close that does what I tell it. In my mind that >> means rolling back and closing. > > That's exactly what I felt after having written a simple app using > autoclosable. > Just wanted to hear if anyone else had stumbled across this behavior > and given it any thought. > >> >> That the current behavior doesn't play well with autoclosable is a (new) >> argument for changed behavior. > > Yes, I hope this is brought up again when we're at a point where we > can change the current behavior without too much trouble.
If we think changing it is the right thing to do, I'd say that now is the right time to do it on trunk. Then we'd have plenty of time to fix any fallouts before the next feature release. I wouldn't expect that changing it would cause problems for existing applications, as it will only make calls that used to fail, succeed. In fact, many users have found the current behaviour surprising. -- Knut Anders
