Brett Wooldridge <[email protected]> writes: > Any ETA on a 10.9.1.1 release? My company is waiting on the fix for > Derby-4279 ("Statement cache deadlock"), and we've got our own release > in about a month. Would be great to pick-up this fix.
Hi Brett, The dates haven't been decided yet, but there was some discussion about releasing 10.9.2 fairly shortly after 10.8.3. See this thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/201210.mbox/%3C5072F9D3.4040702%40sbcglobal.net%3E End of November was mentioned. Not sure if that was meant to be the target for starting the vetting/voting or actually releasing it. > Alternatively, is there away we can compile our own 10.9.1.1 in a way > that will be updatable (DB file compatible) with an official version > of the same? With the caveat that we don't test that upgrade scenario, upgrade from an arbitrary point on a stable branch to a newer released version is supposed to work. So if you build your own jars from head of the 10.9 branch, upgrade to 10.9.2 should in theory not cause any problems. If you do that, you'll probably want to help testing the 10.9.2 release candidate to verify that it doesn't get released with a problem upgrading from your custom build. The upgrade tests in the repository have an option to run against custom builds, which would be a useful sanity check. -- Knut Anders
