-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Army wrote: > Is there a reason why we have the check for missingCodePoint AFTER the > "switch", instead of before?
Thanks Army, I'll fix that up. - --have you run the derbynet and other > related suites/tests with these changes, to make sure there aren't any > regressions? > yes I ran derbyAll and all the other network server test I have. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBueS8G0h36bFmkocRAse+AJ0UdqyRwaformiooSaAGpEA43gRlACgv+FH mchyNDhx+14MqWk+c81n7BQ= =XTpC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
