We have tried HSQL and had isses with the persistance of data. Debry is a way better choice. I do not know one$db.
B-) > -----Original Message----- > From: Eddie Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 4:34 AM > To: Derby Discussion > Subject: RE: OS database > > Hi Bernd, > Thanks for the 1 liner but can you please elaborate on the > features that Derby has and Hsql and one$db don't. Have you > tried all three..? If I am not wrong then even one$db can > work in server and embedded. > > Edd > > > Bernd Ruehlicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A strong 1-liner argument for Derby is: It is close to > 10 years old, > and hence pretty mature. It has a great user group. It > was in IBM's hand > for a while, it can run in embedded and in server mode. > > B-) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eddie Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:54 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: OS database > > > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for an OS database for my Java application. IMO, > > the options are derby, HSQL and the one$db. I have never > > actually used any of them (except for a brief interaction > > with HSQL) and moreover I don't have the time to evaluate all > > three :0( > > > > Help pls!!!! Even a one liner would do. Thanks in advance :0) > > > > Edd > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! > > Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! > Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web > <http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/> >
