Re: [VOTE] Reject tally of logo votes

[Jeremy Boynes]

The problem I saw was that people may have been influenced by the 
questionable votes potentially skewing the result further (for or 
against). The only fair option is to discard all and try again, 
lamenting the huge waste of time this caused.

My pragmatic side also says that the second place tally was for "None of 
the above" so we would not reach closure anyway.

--
Jeremy
Mark W. Davis wrote:
I agree with Jeff. I placed a -1 also. The majority should rule. I voted 
-1 due to the time spent on voting and I think it should be relatively 
easy to null or disqualify duplicate votes and come up with a majority.

Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Jeff Levitt wrote:
We have one veto on the record.  I believe we need an
explanation for the veto in order for it to be
counted?
Veto really applies to technical issues. This vote is really consensus 
so the -1 is a vote against rather than a veto.

--
Jeremy