Michael J. Segel wrote: > On Wednesday 31 August 2005 10:49, Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > >> Thanks for the offer.. It would really be great to have more developpers >>working on Derby. Join the derby-dev alias to participate in the >>development. >> >> Derby embedded driver already has the capability to stream blob/clob, >>without requiring reading them completely into memory. It would be great to >>enhance Derby network server and Derby client to support this kind of >>behavior. >> >> Satheesh >> > > [SNIP] > > This may be a dumb question... > > Maybe its hindsight, but why isn't the Server Framework either a subclass or > an extension to the embedded driver? Someone had posted that the Network > Driver utilized the embedded driver... (Or is that bathtub gin affecting my > memory?) > > I guess it goes more to the point of why not have more focus on a "universal" > driver?
My view http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/db-derby-dev/200508.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Really the two drivers are doing different things, one has to convert requests into messages using DRDA over tcp/ip, the other just calls java methods. Dan.
