Daniel John Debrunner wrote: > Andreas Fredriksson wrote: > > >>On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:59 +0200, Knut Anders Hatlen wrote: >> >> >> >>>Your patch is against Derby 10.1.1.0, but I see that the development >>>sources have changed since that version. Some of the changes are >>>similar to those you proposed. Could you try to run your test using >>>the latest development sources? Thanks! >> >> >>Knut Anders, >> >>I can confirm that the version on the SVN trunk doesn't deadlock with >>the testcase I posted previously. > > > Thanks for testing it, I couldn't reproduce it on the trunk but assumed > it was due to running on a single cpu machine. ! 2cpu machine was my > next step! > > I will merge the associated changes into 10.1 from the trunk and > hopefully they will fix the problem and become part of the upcoming > 10.1.2 release.
The changes Knut pointed out have been merged to 10.1. If you can build the 10.1 branch and try them out that would be great, otherwise you could wait for a snapshot and try that out. Thanks, Dan.
