James A Craig/O/VCU wrote: > Thank you for the fast response. I was looking to set it up so that it > was a single database with table 1 on node 1, table 2 on node 2, etc. > But if I'm reading what you said correctly, this isn't possible. I was > reading a book that dealt with doing this and I wanted to try it out in > practice (it didn't go into any details with actually doing it). However > it sounds like Derby will not let me do this. Is there a database system > out there that will let me do this? > > However I really like Derby thus far and John thank you for the article. > Between it and using the manual I've been able to get started.
Take a look at C-JDBC, see the presentation on this page: http://db.apache.org/derby/integrate/index.html C-JDBC, clustered JDBC, supports what you want to do and supports Derby. Dan.
