Satheesh Bandaram wrote: > Don't think current temporary tables is designed to work in read-only > databases. It is not documented as a supported behavior. So don't think > this is a bug. > > http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.1/ref/rrefdeclaretemptable.html > > Also look at Developer guide about read-only databases: > > http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.1/devguide/tdevdeploy26887.html > > However, this may be useful. An IMPROVEMENT request would be good to file.
Yep, seems like a good improvement, it allows application developers to use temp tables in their application while not allowing modification of the read-only data. Dan.
