On Tuesday 31 January 2006 11:14 am, John Embretsen wrote: > Personally, I would prefer a database with a strong enough helmet to > withstand such hammer hits. Someone else may find that hammer one > day, and hit you again ;)
I think that there are two issues. One how Derby handles itself and attempts to clean up stale objects. The second is that whoever wrote the test didn't know what they were doing. So that question is: "Should Derby be smart enough to protect bad programmers from themselves?". With respect to both issues, any solution will increase the footprint of Derby. This may be a bad thing. So the better question is... do you blame the hammer or the carpenter when he can't hit a nail straight in to the wood? -- -- Michael Segel Principal Michael Segel Consulting Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (312) 952-8175 [mobile]
