Andrew McIntyre wrote: >> java -jar lib/derbytools.jar sysinfo >> java -jar lib/derbytools.jar dblook >> etc. >> >> I have a prototype for this that I'll post to derby-dev. >> >> andrew > > java -jar lib/derbytools.jar ij
IJ started without using the scripts seems to need a JDBC URL to connect. This may not be obvious to everyone and may seem odd to non-JDBC/java users. Should IJ (and other tools) be changed to assume "jdbc:derby:" protocol by default, if not provided? IJ is Derby's SQL processor, so it seems it should be ok to assume derby URL format, if none provided? Satheesh >> >> > I wanted to give everyone a heads up that I'll incorporate the cool > work Andrew did on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1019. To > reduce confusion, I'm suspending the review. I will be presenting a > revised outline for WWD then rework the initial sections and restart > the review process. > > >
