Bryan Pendleton wrote:
Recently, I had a table which was able to substantially
benefit from compression. I determined that I had a problem
by setting derby.logQueryPlan to TRUE, running a "select *"
query against the table, and then viewing the page and
row count statistics that were emitted in the query plan,
where I saw that the optimizer was expecting to process many
more pages than I thought needed to be in the table.
Compressing the table made my problem go away, and the
optimizer returned to choosing my desired query plans.
But I am left with the desire for an easier way to figure
out whether my table needs compression or not.
I tried reading the manual, for example I found
http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.1/adminguide/cadminspace21579.html
but that page does not offer any clear way to tell whether a
table needs to be compressed or not.
What is the preferred way to decide whether a table has unused space?
thanks,
bryan
Hi Bryan,
I don't know this info will be useful for you or not. But in my case I
used compress when i happen to see that even if I delete rows I'm not
getting any space back. This was happening in my test where I kept the
number of rows in the table to be more or less same by doing inserts and
deletes. The db size kept on increasing, even though I was doing the
deletes. Mike's fix for the jira issue 670 and the use of inplace
compression solved most of the problem
Thanks
Manjula