John, as always, your suggestions are helpful, thank you. I will use
your improved wording in quote 2.
[EOM]
John Embretsen wrote:
Stanley Bradbury wrote:
John and other derby-users -
I have rewritten the two the paragraphs mentioned above to address
the points made by John. Please let me know what you think.
quote 1 from "Activity notes", p.6 (8) REWRITE:
In a client / server environment the client program is often used
from other computers on the network. ...
Sounds good, although it probably does not say everything you
originally intended to say here.
quote 2 from "Activity notes", p.6 (8) REWRITE:
Derby's two architectures have caused confusion for some new Derby
users. They mistakenly think that embedded is a single user
configuration. This is not true. The embedded driver supports
multiple simultaneous connections, performs locking and provides
performance, integrity and recoverability. Any embedded application
can open multiple Derby connections and then provide a means for
multiple users to interact with the database on each connection. The
Derby Network Server is an example of such an application.
Very good! Though I think the term "any embedded application" can be
ambiguous. Is "any application using the embedded driver" better?
