| Hi Marieke, You have hit one of the big usability issues with SQL. While many vendors have implemented "WHERE value = ?" such that it behaves exactly like "WHERE value IS NULL" in case the parameter passed is null, it isn't required by the governing standard, and is not therefore a bug in an implementation but a feature. To be portable, you need to have different SQL statements in the case where the parameter is null versus not null. And if you have "n" parameters, you might have to have "2 ^ n" different SQL statements, depending on whether each of the parameters is null or not. Sadly, this is the state of the art in today's database world. Craig On Jul 24, 2006, at 1:27 AM, Marieke Vandamme wrote:
Craig Russell Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! |
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
