David Van Couvering wrote:
I am here at OSCON and a user of Derby was complaining rather energetically to me at the cost of startup time for Derby. He said this is a real problem for running unit tests, as this is compounded by running multiple tests, each one starting up a new database.

I was wondering if other users out there have a similar complaint and if you can give a sense of how important this is. If you can describe your specific usage pattern that would be very helpful.

We have this issue too. Unit tests do take much longer whenever Derby is involved, but also we use a database as a kind of document which the user can load, and it means increased time to load the document from the user's point of view. HSQLDB in comparison was instantaneous.

Daniel



--
Daniel Noll

Nuix Pty Ltd
Suite 79, 89 Jones St, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia    Ph: +61 2 9280 0699
Web: http://www.nuix.com.au/                        Fax: +61 2 9212 6902

This message is intended only for the named recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying,
distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this
message or attachment is strictly prohibited.

Reply via email to