John Embretsen wrote:
Kathey Marsden wrote:
Prasenjit Sarkar (JIRA) wrote:
Regression: The fields of views are not being calculated properly
since 10.1.2.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Good find Prasenjit, Thank you!
Judges for the RegressionSearchAndDestroy contest: can you give me a
ruling. Should this count toward the contest?
I'd like to include any regressions that are found during the
contest period even if they are 10.1.3 regressions.
Can we count this one?
As I understand it, this is something that worked correctly in
10.1.2.4, but that does not work in 10.2 (nor in 10.1.3.x).
The rules say:
"Find a new product regression from a previous Derby release and log
it in Jira."
I would say DERBY-1633 qualifies for the contest, and that the
reporter has contributed toward a seamless upgrade to 10.2. I have not
discussed this privately with the other judges, though, so you should
not consider this the official ruling until they have had time to
comment.
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/RegressionSearchAndDestroy
I agree, this DERBY-1633 indeed fits the rules of the contest and hence
qualifies.
Having said that I would also like to see the fix getting ported to the
10.1 branch.
Regards,
Rajesh
- Re: RegressionSearchAndDestroy ruling: Re: [jira] Created... Rajesh Kartha
-
