Craig L Russell wrote: > > On Sep 12, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > >> >> Craig L Russell wrote: >>> Hi Geir, >>> >>> On Sep 12, 2006, at 3:37 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >>> >>>> I read Rick's note on the 10.2 licensing issue in an archive because of >>>> strange move to the user list, so sorry for the weird quoting : >>> >>> This issue affects users of Derby just as much as developers. Users >>> counting on a production release of Derby to be used with a production >>> version of JDK6 with JDBC4 are directly affected by this change. >> >> Isn't that the case with every aspect of development? > > Nah. > > Users care about their bugs and the features that they use, and the > schedule for the next production release. The topic of discussion is > about the schedule for the next production release. > > It was a judgement call, and I think it was the right one. Should we > have a vote? ;-) >
The problem I was pointing out that it was an important topic of concern to people that have been following on dev. You should give a bit of a notice before kicking things off like that, IMO. geir > Craig >> >> geir >> >>> >>> Craig >>> >>> Craig Russell >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://db.apache.org/jdo >>> >>> > > Craig Russell > Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo > 408 276-5638 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! >
