[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cristian Dudila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Hi,

  We use derby for an application and we need to lock some rows. The
problem is that we would like to know if this rows are already locked.
Using TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ we can lock this rows ( using SELECT
)but we don't know if this rows was already locked. Using "SELECT FOR
UPDATE" derby returns an exception that tell us that the row is
locked, but unfortunately ( for us ) we can lock only one row using
"SELECT FOR UPDATE".

I think it would be better if you could describe what it is you're
trying to achieve.
I want to warn the user if a row is locked in derby database by another user.

Is there a possibility to lock multiple rows, using one connection and
to receive an exception or message ( from derby ) if this rows are
locked by somebody else before ?

Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to do, but in general it
is not a good idea to use the database to communicate between
threads. The database tries its best to hide the fact that other
threads (connections) are accessing the data.

With TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ using a SELECT we will have a shared lock in derby, so we can read data but not to change it( in case of update, from another database connection, we receive an exception that the lock cannot be obtained ). Is there a possibility to check in derby if a row is locked( except to try a dummy UPDATE on that row ) ?

Cristian

Reply via email to