[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dag H. Wanvik) writes: > Geoff hendrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> "Well, it is even harder for us, since we don't see the relevant part >> of your code..." >> >> Oh, I think you misunderstood me. You don't need to see my code to answer my >> question. >> >> My question was: >> >> "ANyone have any ideas what this message might mean?" >> >> The message I am referring to is: >> "Invalid transaction state - held cursor requires same isolation" > > Your analysis is correct; it means that some result set for which > holdability is true is still open when you try to change the isolation > level. > > I think Dyre is trying to say that since we don't have access to your > source code is it hard for others to determine if this is a Derby error > or an error in your application code.
Yes, thanks for clarifying Dag. I should have been a bit more verbose, I guess. -- dt
