Rick, Thanks for the reply. I briefly looked at the 10.4. documentation and it seems that the replication is designed for Derby running as a network server. Is this true?
Our application runs Derby in embedded mode and our customers are wanting to replicate the application on a regular basis (as and when any file/data changes) to the HA systems. What would be our options here to keep the Derby database up-to-date on the HA system? Thanks and Regards, Sai Pullabhotla On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sai, > > Single-node master/slave replication with manual failover was added to Derby > in version 10.4. You should not try to manually copy a Derby database which > is in use. > > Hope this helps, > -Rick > > Sai Pullabhotla wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> We have a need to replicate Derby Database from the production system >> to the High Availability system. The software we use monitors for any >> file changes on the production system and replicates the changed files >> to the High Availability system. My question is - >> >> Is it safe to copy the Derby data files to another system while the >> database is in use on the source system? Will the database on the >> destination still be usable if we do this? >> >> Thanks & Regards, >> >> -- >> Sai Pullabhotla >> www.jMethods.com >> > > -- Sai Pullabhotla Phone: (402) 408-5753 Fax: (402) 408-6861 www.jMethods.com
