Geoff hendrey wrote:
Hi,I am doing something like: SELECT "A"."C1" AS "A.C1", "A"."C2" AS "A.C2" FROM ATABLE AS "A" WHERE "A"."C1" = "X" ORDER BY PKDoes it make sense that PK should be returned in the result set? I expected ONLY "A.C1" and "A.C2" to be the column names returned by JDBC...but I see "PK" as well. It may be a bug in my code somewhere else, or is it possible that the ORDER BY is forcing "PK" to be returned?
I think that it *is* due to the ORDER BY, and I think that it is incorrect behavior. I noticed this myself a while back and tried to pin it down, but I was having trouble isolating a standalone reproducible test case. If you can construct a simple standalone test program which demonstrates this behavior, I think it would be great if you could log it into JIRA so we can track it and study it more. thanks, bryan
