Geoff hendrey wrote:
Hi,

I am doing something like:

SELECT
    "A"."C1" AS "A.C1",
    "A"."C2" AS "A.C2"
FROM
    ATABLE AS "A"
WHERE
    "A"."C1" = "X"
ORDER BY
    PK

Does it make sense that PK should be returned in the result set? I expected ONLY "A.C1" and "A.C2" to be the column names returned by JDBC...but I see "PK" as well. It may be a bug in my code somewhere else, or is it possible that the ORDER BY is forcing "PK" to be returned?

I think that it *is* due to the ORDER BY, and I think that it is
incorrect behavior. I noticed this myself a while back and tried
to pin it down, but I was having trouble isolating a standalone
reproducible test case.

If you can construct a simple standalone test program which demonstrates
this behavior, I think it would be great if you could log it into JIRA
so we can track it and study it more.

thanks,

bryan

Reply via email to