Can you please refer him to this post?
Gili Rick Hillegas-2 wrote: > > Hi Gili, > > I do not believe that Eclipse was used to build 10.4.1.3. However, the > definitive word would have to come from the 10.4.1.3 release manager, > Dyre Tjeldvoll. > > Regards, > -Rick > > cowwoc wrote: >> The version in question is 10.4.1.3. >> >> Gili >> >> >> Rick Hillegas-2 wrote: >> >>> Hi Gili, >>> >>> Can you tell us what release of Derby is causing you problems? I built >>> the distributions for the following releases and I did not use Eclipse >>> to build any of these distributions. I believe that the release notes >>> for these distributions accurately reflect the environment that I used: >>> >>> 10.2.1.6 >>> 10.2.2.0 >>> 10.3.1.4 >>> >>> Hope this helps, >>> -Rick >>> >>> cowwoc wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Can someone please confirm whether derby.jar is really built using >>>> javac >>>> as >>>> the website indicates? It seems the latest version might have been >>>> built >>>> using the Eclipse compiler, and this causes problems for Proguard: >>>> http://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5124830 >>>> >>>> Can someone please confirm whether javac is being used and if not fix >>>> it? >>>> >>>> thank you, >>>> Gili >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-Derby.jar-really-built-using-javac--tp18677264p18695833.html Sent from the Apache Derby Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
