Hi Micke,
Which JPA implementation are you using? Did you have the JPA
implementation create the tables for you? JPA 2.0 will help to
clarify the case behavior semantics.
Regards
Lance
On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:38 AM, Mikael Sundberg wrote:
Hi
I’m working on changing to JPA to talk to my database. But I seem to
have encountered some problems.
My tables named similar to: “MyTable” so I tell my JPA class that
it belongs to “MyTable” but then it looks for MYTABLE and ofcourse
it can’t find it.
When using SQL I have simply used “Select * from \”MyTable\”” to
work around that problem. But in JPA that doesn’t seem to work
either and it doesn’t feel like the correct way to do it either
since then I bind my JPA to only be used with derby. Other databases
seem to understand that “MyTable” is MyTable and not MYTABLE. Is
there any way to work around this problem? Except for renaming the
tables since that simply isn’t an option.
/Micke
