Alan, Did you enter the issue for replication regarding the 10.6? I'd also like to vote and add what I can to help define requirements.
-Brian -----Original Message----- From: Alan Burlison [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 10:14 AM To: Derby Discussion Subject: Re: master and slave are not in synch for replicated database Brian Spindler wrote: > I agree. This seems even more complicated when considering the db from > an embedded standpoint. The slave app has to boot the db without > performing any write operations until it has become master (which I > don't know how it would know this?) In our case we are running Derby embedded inside Tomcat. We could switch, but it would be messy. -- Alan Burlison --
