Sylvain Leroux wrote:
Sylvain Leroux a écrit :
1) Should I use the full JAR name 'MailHelper.jar.G1230379179336' as
codebase in my "grant" rule?
I failed to mention that the following rule does not seem to work:
grant codebase
"file:///path/to/db/jar/APP/MailHelper.jar.G1230379179336" {
permission java.net.SocketPermission "*:25", "connect"
}
Sylvain
Hi Sylvain,
I am not aware of any work that has been done to make it possible to
grant java security privileges to user-coded jar files that are stored
in the database. I also cannot find an existing enhancement request for
this. So I have created DERBY-4354 to track this issue. Feel free to
vote for this issue--that will improve its chances of being considered
for a future feature release.
Thanks,
-Rick
