Hi Flavio,

There is some commentary on the following issue, which might help you make some sense of the trees: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3946

These trees are not part of Derby's public API so there's not a lot of documentation on them other than the Derby engine's javadoc. You may have to ask a couple more questions before you touch bottom.

Hope this helps,
-Rick



flavio palumbo wrote:
Hi Rick,
renaming junit did it ;-))
I've been able to run ASTParser and XmlTreeWalker and I've seen that they give a very big quantity of infos ; where can I find some docs to discover how to point what I need ? In particular I'm searching for tables and fields names included in the statement, which is the quickest way to find them ?
Thanks a lot
Flavio

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Hillegas <[email protected]>
To: Derby Discussion <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:01:50 -0800
Subject: Re: R: using ASTParser and TreeWalker

flavio palumbo wrote:
Hi Rich,
I've just tried to build Derby (now I'm at home with nb 6.5.1 on win
vista)
and got these messages :
.....
.....
Building zip: D:\derby2009\trunk\java\demo\toursdb\toursdb.jar
Finished building toursdb
copyfiles:
Copying 13 files to
D:\derby2009\trunk\classes\org\apache\derbyTesting\functionTests\tests\
demo
toursdb:
demo:
testing:
testing:
junitcomponents:
Compiling 1 source file to D:\derby2009\trunk\classes

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\SecurityM
anagerSetup.java:30:
package junit.extensions does not exist
import junit.extensions.TestSetup;

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\SecurityM
anagerSetup.java:31:
package junit.framework does not exist
import junit.framework.Test;

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\SecurityM
anagerSetup.java:32:
package junit.framework does not exist
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\SecurityM
anagerSetup.java:39:
cannot find symbol
symbol: class TestSetup
public final class SecurityManagerSetup extends TestSetup {

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\SecurityM
anagerSetup.java:73:
cannot find symbol
symbol  : class Test
location: class org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.SecurityManagerSetup
        public SecurityManagerSetup(Test test, String policyResource)
                                    ^

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\SecurityM
anagerSetup.java:94:
cannot find symbol
symbol  : class Test
location: class org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.SecurityManagerSetup
        public static Test noSecurityManager(Test test)
                                             ^

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\SecurityM
anagerSetup.java:94:
cannot find symbol
symbol  : class Test
location: class org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.SecurityManagerSetup
        public static Test noSecurityManager(Test test)
.....
.....

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\JDBC.java
:673:
cannot find symbol
symbol  : variable Assert
location: class org.apache.derbyTesting.junit.JDBC
        Assert.assertEquals("Unexpected column count:",
100 errors
D:\derby2009\trunk\build.xml:499: The following error occurred while executing this line:
D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\build.xml:59: The following error
occurred
while executing this line:

D:\derby2009\trunk\java\testing\org\apache\derbyTesting\junit\build.xml
:74:
Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
BUILD FAILED (total time: 54 seconds)
The previous time I hadn't read carefully the building.html doc, but
now
I've put ant.jar and junit-3.8.2.jar into my
D:\derby2009\trunk\tools\java
directory.
It seems that nothing has changed :-((
Hi Flavio,

Have you tried building Derby outside Netbeans? That might help narrow down the problem. One thing to note: the JUnit jarball should be called junit.jar, not junit-3.8.2.jar. Try renaming the JUnit jarball and see if that helps.

Regards,
-Rick
Thanks a lot
Flavio
-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Hillegas <[email protected]>
To: Derby Discussion <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:35:38 -0800
Subject: Re: R: using ASTParser and TreeWalker

Hi Flavio,

A couple more comments inline...

Flavio Palumbo wrote:
Hi Rich,

thanks for your super quick answer ;-))

Please tell us more about the problems you are having compiling
the
Derby trunk. We want to make the build easier.
I tried to build Derby following the guide at
http://wiki.apache.org/db-derby/BuildingDerby ; I'm currently using
NetBeans
6.5 with jdk 1.6.0 ; when I try to build the project I get a lot of
exceptions due mainly to the fact that I'm not able to add jUnit
jars
to the
project.
I'm bit hurry now, I'll try to generate again the project this week
end to
be more accurate.
Thanks for giving us this feedback. If you configure the ant build target to be "buildsource" rather than "all", then you shouldn't
need
the junit jars. For more information, see the BUILDING.html file in
the
root directory of the Derby trunk.
Yes, you should be able to compile these classes against the
official
debug jars for 10.5.3.0.
what you mean with "debug jars" ?
If you go to the 10.5.3 download page ( http://db.apache.org/derby/releases/release-10.5.3.0.cgi ), you'll
see
a number of downloadable distributions. Two of them have the word
"debug"
in their names. The jars in those two distributions have extra
tracing
logic built into them. The TreeWalker uses that extra tracing logic.

Hope this helps,
-Rick
Thanks a lot.

Flavio


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Inviato: venerdì 6 novembre 2009 15.45
A: Derby Discussion
Oggetto: Re: using ASTParser and TreeWalker


Hi Flavio,

Flavio Palumbo wrote:
Hi all,

I tried test ASTParser and TreeWalker to try to parse SQL
strings and the
first works fine while I cannot compile the second cause I
receive
this
compile time error :
TreeWalker is not abstract and does not override abstract method
visitChildrenFirst(org.apache.derby.iapi.sql.compile.Visitable)
in
org.apache.derby.iapi.sql.compile.Visitor

is there a newer version I can use or can somebody tell me how
to fix this
problem ?

The visitChildrenFirst() method was added to the Visitor interface
recently. I have attached  new versions of TreeWalker,
XmlTreeWalker,
and XmlTreePrinter to DERBY-3946, DERBY-791, and DERBY-4415
respectively. The new versions implement the new method and should
compile against the current Derby trunk. If this doesn't fix your
problem, let me know and I'll look into this more.
also I found the post "Rick Hillegas added a comment -
25/Aug/09 04:00 PM"
on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3946 :

I have successfully compiled and run this ASTParser against the
debug
derby.jar that is part of the 10.5.3.0 distribution

it means that I can compile and run ASTParser and TreeWalker
against the
normal distribution of Derby ?

Yes, you should be able to compile these classes against the
official
debug jars for 10.5.3.0.
this would be great cause I fight a lot to compile Derby from
svn.
Please tell us more about the problems you are having compiling
the
Derby trunk. We want to make the build easier.

Thanks,
-Rick
Any hint would be appreciated.

Flavio


-----------------------------------------------------------
Il presente messaggio non costituisce un impegno contrattuale
tra SILMA S.r.l. ed il destinatario.
Le opinioni ivi espresse sono quelle dell'autore.
SILMA S.r.l. non assume alcuna responsabilita riguardo al
contenuto del presente messaggio.
Il messaggio è destinato esclusivamente al destinatario.
Il contenuto e gli allegati sono da considerarsi di natura
confidenziale
Nel caso abbiate ricevuto il presente messaggio per errore
siete pregati di comunicarlo
alla casella [email protected].


-----------------------------------------------------------
Il presente messaggio non costituisce un impegno contrattuale tra
SILMA S.r.l. ed il destinatario.
Le opinioni ivi espresse sono quelle dell'autore.
SILMA S.r.l. non assume alcuna responsabilita riguardo al contenuto
del presente messaggio.
Il messaggio è destinato esclusivamente al destinatario.
Il contenuto e gli allegati sono da considerarsi di natura
confidenziale
Nel caso abbiate ricevuto il presente messaggio per errore siete
pregati di comunicarlo
alla casella [email protected].

-----------------------------------------------------------
Il presente messaggio non costituisce un impegno contrattuale tra
SILMA S.r.l. ed il destinatario.
Le opinioni ivi espresse sono quelle dell'autore.
SILMA S.r.l. non assume alcuna responsabilita riguardo al contenuto
del presente messaggio.
Il messaggio è destinato esclusivamente al destinatario.
Il contenuto e gli allegati sono da considerarsi di natura
confidenziale
Nel caso abbiate ricevuto il presente messaggio per errore siete
pregati di comunicarlo
alla casella [email protected].



-----------------------------------------------------------
Il presente messaggio non costituisce un impegno contrattuale tra SILMA S.r.l. 
ed il destinatario.
Le opinioni ivi espresse sono quelle dell'autore.
SILMA S.r.l. non assume alcuna responsabilita riguardo al contenuto del 
presente messaggio.
Il messaggio è destinato esclusivamente al destinatario.
Il contenuto e gli allegati sono da considerarsi di natura confidenziale

Nel caso abbiate ricevuto il presente messaggio per errore siete pregati di 
comunicarlo
alla casella [email protected].


Reply via email to